Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
95 종합 점수
vs
Sennheiser CX CX 150BT
Sennheiser
42 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
사양
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Sennheiser CX CX 150BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | XS, S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | — | 17 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 28 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC, AAC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | USB-C |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 10 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | fast USB-C charging |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | Sennheiser Smart Control App |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
장단점
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Sennheiser CX CX 150BT
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong sound (74th percentile)
- Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
- Below average mic (35th percentile)
결론
승자: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 34 specs.