ViewSonic VX1655 15.6"
ViewSonic
41 総合スコア
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021
ASUS
85 総合スコア
スコア
Office
Gaming
Portable
Professional
Entertainment
Creative
スペック
| ViewSonic VX1655 15.6" | ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 34" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 4 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 550 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 262K Colors (6-Bit) | 120% sRGB / DCI-P3 90% |
| Color Depth | 6-bit | 16.7 Million |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 2★ |
| USB-C | 2 | 4★ |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | 11W★ | 35W |
| Weight | 0.80 kg★ | 9.01 kg |
長所と短所
ViewSonic VX1655 15.6"
- Strong compact (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong connectivity (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average color (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average display (22th percentile)
- Below average feature (24th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (29th percentile)
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong display (79th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
価格
ViewSonic VX1655 15.6"0.010ドルあたりのスコア
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 20210.012ドルあたりのスコア
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021 1.2倍のコストパフォーマンス
ViewSonic VX1655 15.6"
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021
結論
勝者: ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34"
Scores 85 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 29 specs.
