ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ASUS
99 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Dell Pro E2225HSM 21.5"
Dell
43 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | Dell Pro E2225HSM 21.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 22" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 100 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | Adaptive-Sync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 72% NTSC |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 16.7 Million Colors |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W | 11W★ |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 4.11 kg★ |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
Dell Pro E2225HSM 21.5"
- Strong ergonomic (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong compact (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Below average display (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average color (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average feature (23th percentile)
Prezzi
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 20240.008punteggio per dollaro
vs
Dell Pro E2225HSM 21.5"0.025punteggio per dollaro
Dell Pro E2225HSM 21.5" offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.1x migliore
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
Dell Pro E2225HSM 21.5"
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 99 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 28 specs.
