Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
95 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Google Pixel Buds Pro GA05762-US
Google
84 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Specifiche
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Google Pixel Buds Pro GA05762-US | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | Extra small, Small, Medium, Large |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Impedance | — | 120 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | 5 Minutes for 1.5 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 30 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 3★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | IPX4 |
Pro e Contro
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Google Pixel Buds Pro GA05762-US
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong mic (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
Verdetto
Vincitore: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 2 of 34 specs.