FLATIC
FLATIC
33 Score global
vs
Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP Compact System
Fujifilm
45 Score global
Scores
Photography
Product Photography
Sports Wildlife
Beginner
Video
Travel
Youtube
Wedding Events
Streaming
Vlogging
Spécifications
| FLATIC | Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP Compact System | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/3-inch | APS-C |
| Megapixels | 64 MP★ | 16.299999237060547 MP |
| Processor | — | EXR Image Processor |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 6 fps★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 1080p★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 24 fps★ |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 2.8"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.78 kg★ | 0.86 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
FLATIC
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP Compact System
- Strong evf (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong build (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong social proof (76th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (72th percentile)
- Below average video (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average af (34th percentile)
Prix
FLATIC0.021score par dollar
vs
Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP Compact System0.001score par dollar
FLATIC offre un rapport qualité-prix 21.0x meilleur
FLATIC
Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP Compact System
Verdict
Gagnant: Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP Compact System
Scores 45 overall, wins 4 of 10 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
