Sigma fp fp
Sigma
62 Score global
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White
Kodak
25 Score global
Scores
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Streaming
Beginner
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Photography
Video
Youtube
Vlogging
Spécifications
| Sigma fp fp | Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | back-illuminated 35mm full-frame Bayer sensor★ | — |
| Size | full-frame | — |
| Megapixels | 24.600000381469727 MP★ | — |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 49★ | — |
| AF Type | Contrast Detection: 49 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 18 fps★ | — |
| Burst (Electronic) | 18 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/8000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | CinemaDNG | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3.2"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.37 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C | USB |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI 1.4 | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma fp fp
- Strong sensor (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong burst (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong video (72th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (15th percentile)15th %ile
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White
- Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average sensor (26th percentile)
Prix
Sigma fp fp0.001score par dollar
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White0.011score par dollar
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White offre un rapport qualité-prix 11.0x meilleur
Sigma fp fp
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White
Verdict
Gagnant: Sigma fp fp
Scores 62 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 18 of 27 specs.
