Apple FDJ300

Apple FDJ300

Apple
34 Puntuación general
vs
JBL Tune 770NC

JBL Tune 770NC

JBL
86 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Budget
Apple
35
JBL
83
Commute
Apple
29
JBL
78
Music
Apple
40
JBL
72
Work
Apple
24
JBL
72
Gaming
Apple
29
JBL
71
Calls
Apple
21
JBL
65
Studio
Apple
46
JBL
61

Especificaciones

Apple FDJ300JBL Tune 770NC
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.23 kg
Audio
Driver TypeNeodymiumDynamic
Driver Size40 mm40 mm
Freq Min15 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance40 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB100 dB
CodecsAdjustable Headband, Built-In Voice Assistant, Foldable, Multipoint Pairing, Noise Cancellation
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length1.5 m
Battery
Battery Life70 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging5min=3hrs
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Alexa, Siri
AppJBL Headphones
Gaming Mode
Water ResistanceWater-Resistant

Pros y Contras

Apple FDJ300

  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong sound (73th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31th percentile)

JBL Tune 770NC

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile

Precios

Apple FDJ300 is 704 MXN cheaper (1.3x less).

Apple FDJ3000.016puntos por dólar
vs
JBL Tune 770NC0.031puntos por dólar

JBL Tune 770NC ofrece 1.9x mejor relación calidad-precio

Veredicto

Ganador: JBL Tune 770NC

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 30 specs.

JBL Tune 770NC Mejor en:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

También considerar