Dell Chromebook 11.6" 3120 Multi-Touch Review

The Dell Chromebook 3120 is one of the most portable laptops you can buy, but its painfully slow performance makes it hard to recommend for anyone but the most specific users.

CPU Intel Celeron
RAM 4 GB
Storage 64 GB
Screen 11.6" 1366x768
GPU Intel UHD Graphics
OS Chrome OS
Weight 1.4 kg
Battery 42 Wh
Dell Chromebook 11.6" 3120 Multi-Touch laptop
16.3 Overall Score

Overview

The Dell Chromebook 11.6" 3120 is a study in extremes. On one hand, its 1.38kg weight and 11.6-inch size put it in the 98th percentile for compactness. On the other, its Intel Celeron CPU and 4GB of RAM land in the 2nd and 4th percentiles for performance, respectively. This isn't a machine for heavy lifting. It's a single-purpose device built for one thing: running Chrome OS in a very small, very portable package. The 64GB SSD and 1366x768 screen don't help its case, sitting in the 7th and 3rd percentiles. You're getting a lot of portability, but not much else under the hood.

Performance

Let's be clear: performance is not this Chromebook's strong suit. That single-core 1.3GHz Celeron is a legacy chip, and it shows. It scores a 2nd percentile ranking for CPU power. That means 98% of the laptops in our database are faster. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics and 4GB of RAM don't fare much better, landing in the 43rd and 4th percentiles. For basic web browsing, Google Docs, and streaming video, it'll get the job done. But open more than a handful of tabs, and you'll feel the strain. Its best performance metric is actually its WiFi 6 connectivity, which is a nice touch for such a budget device.

Performance Percentiles

CPU 1.4
GPU 49.1
RAM 5.2
Ports 84
Screen 2.1
Portability 97.9
Storage 12.6
Reliability 30.5

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely portable, ranking in the 98th percentile for compactness. 98th
  • Includes a multi-touch screen, which is handy for a device this size. 84th
  • WiFi 6 support provides modern wireless connectivity.
  • Chrome OS is lightweight and starts up quickly on the 64GB SSD.
  • The 42Wh battery should last a full school or workday for light tasks.

Cons

  • CPU performance is in the 2nd percentile, making it painfully slow for anything beyond basics. 1th
  • Only 4GB of RAM (4th percentile) severely limits multitasking. 2th
  • The 11.6" 1366x768 display is low-resolution and ranks in the 3rd percentile. 5th
  • 64GB of storage (7th percentile) fills up fast, even with cloud reliance. 13th
  • Reliability scores are low, sitting at the 28th percentile.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

CPU Intel Celeron
Cores 1
Frequency 1.3 GHz
L3 Cache 6 MB

Graphics

GPU UHD Graphics
Type integrated
VRAM Type Shared

Memory & Storage

RAM 4 GB
RAM Generation DDR5
Storage 64 GB
Storage Type SSD

Display

Size 11.6"
Resolution 1366
Panel LCD
Refresh Rate 60 Hz
Brightness 220 nits

Connectivity

USB Ports 3
Wi-Fi WiFi 6
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.1

Physical

Weight 1.4 kg / 3.0 lbs
Battery 42 Wh
OS Chrome OS

Value & Pricing

At around $405, this Chromebook is priced for its portability, not its power. You're paying a premium for the small form factor and the Dell brand. For the same money, you could find Chromebooks with better screens, more RAM, and faster processors, but they'll likely be bigger and heavier. It's a niche product. If being ultra-compact is your absolute top priority, and you only need it for the lightest of tasks, the value is there. For everyone else, it's a tough sell when you consider the performance sacrifices.

Price History

$400 $405 $410 $415 $420 $425 Feb 18Mar 21Apr 1 $420

vs Competition

Compared to its listed 'competitors' like the MacBook Pro or MSI Vector, it's not even in the same universe. A more realistic comparison is against other budget Chromebooks. The Lenovo ThinkPad P14s, while a business laptop, highlights the gap: you get a proper CPU, more RAM, and a better screen for not much more money if you find a sale. The ASUS Zenbook Duo offers transformative dual-screen productivity. This Dell Chromebook's only real advantage is its size. It's smaller and lighter than almost anything else, but that comes at a massive cost to every other spec.

Spec Dell Chromebook 11.6" 3120 Multi-Touch Apple MacBook Air Apple 13" MacBook Air (M4, Sky Blue) Lenovo Yoga Lenovo - Yoga Slim 9i - Copilot+ PC - 14" 4K 120Hz Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro Samsung - Galaxy Book5 Pro - Copilot+ PC - 14" 3K ASUS ZenBook ASUS - Zenbook 14 14" OLED Touch Laptop - Intel Microsoft Surface Laptop Microsoft 15" Surface Laptop Copilot+ PC (7th
CPU Intel Celeron Apple M4 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Core Ultra 7 Series 2 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
RAM (GB) 4 24 32 32 32 32
Storage (GB) 64 512 1000 1000 1000 1024
Screen 11.6" 1366x768 13.6" 2560x1664 14" 3840x2400 14" 2880x1800 14" 2880x1800 15" 2496x1664
GPU Intel UHD Graphics Apple M4 10-core Intel Arc Graphics Intel Arc Graphics Intel Arc Graphics Qualcomm X1
OS Chrome OS macOS Sequoia 15.1 Windows 11 Home Windows 11 Home Windows 11 Pro Windows 11 Home
Weight (kg) 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.7
Battery (Wh) 42 53 75 - 75 66
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product CpuGpuRamPortScreenCompactStorageReliability
Dell Chromebook 11.6" 3120 Multi-Touch 1.449.15.2842.197.912.630.5
Apple MacBook Air 13" Compare 75.120.668.593.685.490.249.194.8
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14" Compare 65.766.694.690.699.984.772.375.6
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro Galaxy Book5 Pro 14" 3K Compare 6966.686.990.693.584.972.375.6
ASUS ZenBook 14" Compare 89.266.694.197.294.184.572.355.8
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15" Compare 98.64286.996.886.253.784.775.6

Verdict

This is a one-trick pony, and that trick is being tiny. The 98th percentile compactness is impressive, but it's surrounded by bottom-tier performance rankings. The 2nd percentile CPU and 4th percentile RAM are deal-breakers for most users. I can only recommend the Dell Chromebook 3120 to a very specific person: someone who needs the absolute smallest, lightest device possible, and whose computing needs are strictly limited to a few browser tabs and document editing. For students, businesses, or anyone wanting a more versatile machine, look elsewhere. The performance trade-offs are just too severe.