Apple iPhone X A1865 Silver 256GB
Apple
36 Overall Score
vs
Honor X9c Black 256GB
Honor
58 Overall Score
Scores
Battery Life
Foldable
Gaming
Photography
Flagship
Business
Budget
Rugged
Compact
Specifications
| Apple iPhone X A1865 | Honor X9c | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 5.8 | 6.8 |
| Display Type | Super Retina XDR | AMOLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 4000 nits★ |
| HDR | ✓ | ✓ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor Model | Apple A11 Bionic | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| CPU Cores | — | 8★ |
| CPU Speed | 2.40★ | 2.20 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB★ |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Expandable | — | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 12 MP | 108 MP★ |
| Camera Count | 2 | 3★ |
| Ultrawide | — | 5 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 7 MP | 16 MP★ |
| Video | — | 4K@30fps★ |
| OIS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 2,716 mAh | 6,600 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | — | 66W★ |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Fast Charging | Fast Charge | Fast Charging |
| Connector | Lightning | USB-C★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1★ |
| NFC | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | Lightning | USB-C 2.0★ |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| eSIM | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IP67★ | IP65M |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | 0.28 kg★ | — |
| Fingerprint | — | in-display |
| Face Recognition | ✓★ | — |
| OS | iOS | Android |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Apple iPhone X A1865 Silver 256GB
- Strong feature (78th percentile)
- Below average performance (23th percentile)
- Below average social proof (31th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (32th percentile)
Honor X9c Black 256GB
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong camera (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong connectivity (71th percentile)
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Honor X9c
Scores 58 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 16 of 37 specs.