Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
95 Overall Score
vs
Philips
Philips
20 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Specifications
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Philips | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | in-ear |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | three sizes of interchangeable rubber ear tips |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | Philips USB C Earbuds Wired with Microphone, in Ear Type C Headphones with mic, Powerful Bass, Lightweight, USB-C Wired Earphones, 3-Button in-line Remote Ear Buds (Black) |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
Pros & Cons
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Philips
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
Pricing
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
No current pricing available
Philips
Verdict
Winner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 31 specs.
