Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Nextbase
19 Overall Score
vs
FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
33 Overall Score

Scores

Beginner
Nextbase
17
FLATIC
37
Video
Nextbase
14
FLATIC
37
Product Photography
Nextbase
14
FLATIC
33
Youtube
Nextbase
12
FLATIC
31
Photography
Nextbase
15
FLATIC
31
Wedding Events
Nextbase
13
FLATIC
28
Sports Wildlife
Nextbase
15
FLATIC
26
Streaming
Nextbase
9
FLATIC
25
Travel
Nextbase
12
FLATIC
24
Vlogging
Nextbase
7
FLATIC
23

Specifications

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera BackFLATIC
Sensor
Type—CMOS
Size—1/3-inch
Megapixels—64 MP★
Video
Max Resolution—5K
Log Profile—✓★
Build
Weight—0.78 kg★

Pros & Cons

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

FLATIC

  • Strong video (77th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average display (26th percentile)
  • Below average burst (29th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)

Pricing

FLATIC is MX$3,152 cheaper (3.0x less).

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back0.004score per dollar
vs
FLATIC0.021score per dollar

FLATIC offers 5.3x better value for money

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Amazon.com.mx
MX$4,702

FLATIC

Amazon.com.mx
MX$1,550

Verdict

★ Winner: FLATIC

Scores 33 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 6 specs.

FLATIC Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Also Consider

LR1
LIYTIFOR LR1
48 MX$4,668
FJFJOPK
FJFJOPK FJFJOPK
47 MX$4,492
ZHAOHUIXIN
ZHAOHUIXIN ZHAOHUIXIN
43 MX$2,040
View Details & Prices: Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back View Details & Prices: FLATIC