UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023
UMIDIGI
65 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022
Samsung
47 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Art Design
Reading
Business
Student
Entertainment
Productivity
Spezifikationen
| UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2000 MHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB★ | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB★ | 64 GB |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11" | 8.7" |
| Resolution | — | 800 px★ |
| Panel | — | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | — | 60 Hz★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | 802.11g |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓★ | — |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✗ | — |
| Face Unlock | ✓★ | — |
| IP Rating | IP68 & IP69K | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.76 kg | 0.48 kg★ |
| OS | Android | Android 13 |
Vor- & Nachteile
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average screen (27th percentile)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022
- Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong gpu (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Below average screen (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average storage (29th percentile)
- Below average feature (30th percentile)
- Below average ram (32th percentile)
Preise
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 20230.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 20220.015Score pro Dollar
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022 bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022
Fazit
Gewinner: UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1
Scores 65 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 20 specs.
