ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro 512GB
ASUS
76 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A3083 Desert Titanium 256GB
Apple
46 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Battery Life
Flagship
Foldable
Photography
Business
Rugged
Budget
Compact
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro | Apple iPhone 16 Pro A3083 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.8 | 6.3 |
| Display Type | LTPO AMOLED★ | Super Retina XDR |
| Refresh Rate | 185 Hz★ | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | 2500 nits★ | — |
| HDR | — | ✓★ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor Model | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Apple A18 |
| CPU Cores | 8★ | — |
| RAM | 16 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0★ | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Camera Count | 3 | 3 |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 48 MP★ |
| Telephoto | 32 MP★ | — |
| Front Camera | 32 MP★ | — |
| Video | 8K★ | — |
| OIS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 5,800 mAh★ | — |
| Wired Charging | 65W★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Fast Charging | PD 3.0, QC 5.0 | — |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth |
| NFC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C 3.1★ | — |
| SIM | eSIM, nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| eSIM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IP68★ | — |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | — | 0.14 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | in-display | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓ | ✓ |
| OS | Android | iOS |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro 512GB
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (93th percentile)93th %ile
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A3083 Desert Titanium 256GB
- Strong performance (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong display (79th percentile)
- Strong camera (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (26th percentile)
- Below average battery (28th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro
Scores 76 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 20 of 37 specs.