Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 Pro 32" QD

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 Pro 32" QD

Gigabyte
77 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Gigabyte
81
MSI
88
Office
Gigabyte
72
MSI
86
Professional
Gigabyte
73
MSI
86
Entertainment
Gigabyte
76
MSI
84
Creative
Gigabyte
70
MSI
82
Portable
Gigabyte
13
MSI
14

Spezifikationen

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 Pro 32" QDMSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"
Display
Size32"27"
Resolution3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Panel TypeOLEDOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProG-Sync Compatible
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits450 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P399% DCI-P3
Color Depth30 bit10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR400HDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power78W
Weight8.53 kg8.10 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 Pro 32" QD

  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21th percentile)

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"

Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 28 specs.

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Besser bei:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment