Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ 49" Black 2024

Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ 49" Black 2024

Gigabyte
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Gigabyte
93
MSI
87
Professional
Gigabyte
71
MSI
90
Office
Gigabyte
83
MSI
87
Creative
Gigabyte
69
MSI
87
Entertainment
Gigabyte
84
MSI
78
Portable
Gigabyte
14
MSI
14

Spezifikationen

Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ 49"MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"
Display
Size49"27"
Resolution5120x14403840 x 2160
Panel TypeQD-OLEDOLED
Aspect Ratio32:916:9
Curved
Curvature1,800
Performance
Refresh Rate144 Hz240 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProG-Sync Compatible
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits450 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P398% Adobe RGB, 99% DCI-P3, 138% sRGB
Color Depth10-bit10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight11.28 kg8.10 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ 49" Black 2024

  • Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"

Scores 96 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 5 of 28 specs.

Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ 49" Besser bei:

GamingEntertainment

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Besser bei:

OfficeCreativeProfessional