ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
99 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Xiaomi G27i-US 27" 2025
Xiaomi
55 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | Xiaomi G27i-US 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 165 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | FreeSync Premium |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 99% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | — |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 3.59 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
Xiaomi G27i-US 27" 2025
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong performance (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (72th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average compact (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (28th percentile)
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.008Score pro Dollar
vs
Xiaomi G27i-US 27" 20250.015Score pro Dollar
Xiaomi G27i-US 27" 2025 bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
Xiaomi G27i-US 27" 2025
Fazit
Gewinner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 99 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 28 specs.
