Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
93 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Sony
71 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
95
Sony
57
Travel
Panasonic
90
Sony
68
Video Cinema
Panasonic
89
Sony
61
Budget
Panasonic
88
Sony
66
Landscape
Panasonic
88
Sony
76
Professional
Panasonic
87
Sony
73
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
83
Sony
61
Portrait
Panasonic
80
Sony
52
Street
Panasonic
80
Sony
60

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmSony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm25 mm
Elements1716
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements43
CoatingFluorine coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/422
Min Aperture4-7.12.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm180 mm
Max Magnification0.5x0.2x

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong build (74th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (25th percentile)

Preise

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen