Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
93 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon Retropia 32mm
Canon
42 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Budget
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Spezifikationen
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | Canon Retropia 32mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 32 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 32 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | 11★ |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | 11 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Canon RF |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg | 0.05 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 1.50 m |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
Canon Retropia 32mm
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average macro (31th percentile)
Preise
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon Retropia 32mm0.041Score pro Dollar
Canon Retropia 32mm bietet 10.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Canon Retropia 32mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
