Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma DC 203101 8-16mm

Sigma DC 203101 8-16mm

Sigma
55 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
75
Sigma
69
Budget
Viltrox
66
Sigma
56
Portrait
Viltrox
65
Sigma
61
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Sigma
53
Travel
Viltrox
59
Sigma
61
Professional
Viltrox
60
Sigma
56
Video Cinema
Viltrox
59
Sigma
55
Macro
Viltrox
59
Sigma
32
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Sigma
48

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mmSigma DC 203101 8-16mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min56 mm8 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm16 mm
Elements11
Groups9
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/4.5
Min Aperture1.74.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ECanon EF
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.17 kg0.06 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMHSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm
Max Magnification1:9.090.12x

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma DC 203101 8-16mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (73th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21th percentile)

Preise

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm is 37.100 MX$ cheaper (15.1x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.027Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma DC 203101 8-16mm0.001Score pro Dollar

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm bietet 27.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Sigma DC 203101 8-16mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma DC 203101 8-16mm Besser bei:

Travel

Auch in Betracht ziehen