Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
93 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Viltrox
59
Panasonic
95
Travel
Viltrox
58
Panasonic
90
Video Cinema
Viltrox
60
Panasonic
89
Budget
Viltrox
66
Panasonic
88
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Panasonic
88
Professional
Viltrox
60
Panasonic
87
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Panasonic
83
Portrait
Viltrox
66
Panasonic
80
Street
Viltrox
75
Panasonic
80

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typeprimemacro
Focal Length Min56 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm200 mm
Elements1117
Groups913
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements44
CoatingHD nano-coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/4
Min Aperture1.74-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm140 mm
Max Magnification1:9.090.5x

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)

Preise

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm is 20.582 MX$ cheaper (8.8x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.027Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.004Score pro Dollar

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm bietet 6.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen