Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

Sony
27 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
75
Sony
25
Budget
Viltrox
66
Sony
20
Portrait
Viltrox
65
Sony
31
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Sony
25
Professional
Viltrox
60
Sony
28
Video Cinema
Viltrox
59
Sony
32
Macro
Viltrox
59
Sony
30
Travel
Viltrox
59
Sony
15
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Sony
13

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mmSony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm33 mm
Elements11
Groups9
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1622
Min Aperture1.71.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades916
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weight0.17 kg
Filter Thread52 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm488 mm
Max Magnification1:9.09

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average aperture (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen