Sirui Venus Venus E35 35mm
Sirui
30 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Street
Budget
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Sirui Venus Venus E35 35mm | Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 56 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 56 mm |
| Elements | — | 11 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | HD nano-coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 16 | 16 |
| Min Aperture | 2.9 | 1.7 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weight | 1.36 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 35 mm★ | 550 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:9.09★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sirui Venus Venus E35 35mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average build (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Preise
Sirui Venus Venus E35 35mm0.001Score pro Dollar
vs
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.027Score pro Dollar
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm bietet 27.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Sirui Venus Venus E35 35mm
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Scores 71 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.
