AstrHori MF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
AstrHori
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Street
Budget
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| AstrHori MF 9mm f/2.8 9mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 9 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 9 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 9 |
| Groups | 8 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 16★ | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.31 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 200 mm★ | 249 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
AstrHori MF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
- Strong macro (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong build (71th percentile)
- Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
Preise
AstrHori MF 9mm f/2.8 9mm0.012Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027Score pro Dollar
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
AstrHori MF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.
