Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm
Viltrox
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Budget
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 13 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 13 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 9 |
| Groups | 11 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 1.4 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.41 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 220 mm★ | 249 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.1x | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Below average macro (27th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
Preise
Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm0.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027Score pro Dollar
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 2.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 20 specs.
