ASUS ZenBook A14 14"
ASUS
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024
Acer
77 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Creator
Compact
Entertainment
Student
Business
Developer
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ZenBook A14 14" | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 | Intel Core Ultra 7 165H★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Keine Daten | |
| Cores | 8 | 16★ |
| Frequency | 3.4 GHz★ | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | X1 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | Shared | GDDR6★ |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Storage 1 | 512 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 3200 px★ |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 600 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | Pantone-validated | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 1 | 3★ |
| Thunderbolt | 2 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 6E★ | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.09 kg★ | 2.05 kg |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ZenBook A14 14"
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong cpu (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong compact (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong screen (78th percentile)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024
- Strong screen (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong port (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong gpu (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average compact (17th percentile)17th %ile
Preise
ASUS ZenBook A14 14"
No current pricing available
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024
Fazit
Gewinner: Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N
Scores 77 overall, wins 3 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
