Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001609
Beyerdynamic
77 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Music
Work
Commute
Studio
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001609 | JBL Tune 770NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | Closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.23 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC | Adjustable Headband, Built-In Voice Assistant, Foldable, Multipoint Pairing, Noise Cancellation |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 0.25 hrs★ | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15 min for 15 hours playback | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | 630 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Fast Pair | Google Assistant, Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | beyerdynamic app | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Vor- & Nachteile
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001609
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong comfort (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (35th percentile)
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
Preise
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 10016090.010Score pro Dollar
vs
JBL Tune 770NC0.031Score pro Dollar
JBL Tune 770NC bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001609
JBL Tune 770NC
Fazit
Gewinner: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 2 of 7 usage categories and 4 of 37 specs.
