Fostex TH808
Fostex
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Music
Work
Gaming
Calls
Studio
Spezifikationen
| Fostex TH808 | JBL Tune 770NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.37 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | low-resilience cushions | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 45 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 100 dB★ |
| Codecs | — | Adjustable Headband, Built-In Voice Assistant, Foldable, Multipoint Pairing, Noise Cancellation |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 6.35mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Alexa, Siri |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Vor- & Nachteile
Fostex TH808
- Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average anc (31th percentile)
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
Preise
Fostex TH8080.001Score pro Dollar
vs
JBL Tune 770NC0.031Score pro Dollar
JBL Tune 770NC bietet 31.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fostex TH808
JBL Tune 770NC
Fazit
Gewinner: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 31 specs.
