Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Apple EarPods EarPods (USB-C)
Apple
49 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Calls
Travel
Music
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Apple EarPods EarPods (USB-C) | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | General use |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Apple EarPods (USB-C) |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 40 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | — |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | USB-C |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Apple EarPods EarPods (USB-C)
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 39 specs.