Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Calls
Technics
100
TOZO
70
Travel
Technics
100
TOZO
77
Budget
Technics
94
TOZO
82
Music
Technics
93
TOZO
68
Commute
Technics
92
TOZO
69
Gaming
Technics
90
TOZO
79
Fitness
Technics
83
TOZO
71

Spezifikationen

Technics EAH-AZ100TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip PairsMedium
Weight0.01 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCLDAC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptivehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.35.4
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count64
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOSTOZO App
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness