Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S

Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S

Technics
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
BASN Bmaster

BASN Bmaster

BASN
38 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Calls
Technics
98
BASN
20
Commute
Technics
96
BASN
21
Budget
Technics
96
BASN
49
Travel
Technics
95
BASN
23
Music
Technics
95
BASN
35
Gaming
Technics
88
BASN
28
Fitness
Technics
82
BASN
18

Spezifikationen

Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-SBASN Bmaster
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessin-ear
Ear TipsXS, S, M, L, XLS, M, L
Weight0.01 kg0.26 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic, balanced armature
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers13
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz20 kHz
Impedance34 Ω
Sensitivity107 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACBASN Bmaster Triple Drivers in Ear Monitor Headphone with Two Detachable Cables Fit in Ear Suitable for Audio Engineer, Musician (Grey)
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Capacity85 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count81
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantAlexa, Siri
Touch Controls
AppTechnics Audio Connect
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S

  • Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile

BASN Bmaster

  • Strong sound (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)
  • Below average build (33th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 37 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness