Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Shokz OpenFit Pro

Shokz OpenFit Pro

Shokz
74 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
100
Shokz
76
Commute
Apple
96
Shokz
65
Travel
Apple
96
Shokz
73
Calls
Apple
94
Shokz
66
Fitness
Apple
91
Shokz
71
Gaming
Apple
81
Shokz
73
Music
Apple
75
Shokz
58

Spezifikationen

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/AShokz OpenFit Pro
Design
Form Factorin-earopen-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsXXS, XS, S, M, Lsilicone inserts
Weight0.09 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamicdynamic
Driver Size11 mm
Drivers12
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBC
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive AudioOpen-Ear Noise Reduction
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.36.0
Multipoint
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs50 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs50 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count23
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOSShokz app
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP57IP55

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Shokz OpenFit Pro

  • Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 2 of 32 specs.

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness