Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
CCA CRA PRO
CCA
42 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Spezifikationen
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | CCA CRA PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | In-ear |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.06 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 23 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | High-Efficiency Magnetic Drive System, Breakthrough Ultra-Thin Diaphragm, Detachable Cable Design |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Android & iOS | Android |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
CCA CRA PRO
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
- Below average mic (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
- Below average build (33th percentile)
Preise
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
No current pricing available
CCA CRA PRO
Fazit
Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 33 specs.
