Apple SweetFlow

Apple SweetFlow

Apple
47 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Bose
98 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
54
Bose
97
Calls
Apple
29
Bose
85
Travel
Apple
27
Bose
85
Gaming
Apple
37
Bose
84
Music
Apple
31
Bose
81
Commute
Apple
26
Bose
79
Fitness
Apple
48
Bose
79

Spezifikationen

Apple SweetFlowBose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylerounded_tiptrue wireless
Ear TipslSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.01 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypedynamicDynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsaptX Adaptive
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesA2DP, HFP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorLightning
Range9.100000381469727 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging20 Minutes for 2 Hours
ChargingLightningUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery18 hrs
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppiOSBose app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple SweetFlow

  • Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average mic (35th percentile)

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Scores 98 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness