HP OMEN 16L Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN 16L Panda Metal 2025

HP
70 Gesamtbewertung
vs
CLX Horus TGMHORRTU5106BM Black 2025

CLX Horus TGMHORRTU5106BM Black 2025

CLX
89 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
72
CLX
92
Workstation
HP
72
CLX
89
Home Office
HP
65
CLX
87
Creator
HP
68
CLX
86
Developer
HP
72
CLX
85
Ai Llm
HP
50
CLX
83
Business
HP
66
CLX
75
Compact
HP
50
CLX
28

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN 16LCLX Horus TGMHORRTU5106BM
Processor
CPU*Intel Core Ultra 7 265FAMD Ryzen 9 9950X
CPU Multi-Core Score
49,507
71,585
Cores2016
Frequency2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L3 Cache30 MB128 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GPU Benchmark Score
20,798
35,759
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM8 GB16 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB96 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB2 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDNVMe SSD
Storage 27.8 TB
Storage 2 TypeHDD
Build
Form Factormini-towermid-tower
PSU400W850W
Weight22.59 kg19.05 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports21
USB Ports612
HDMIYes1x HDMI
DisplayPort3 DisplayPort3x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Yes
EthernetRealtek 10/100/1000/2500 GbE NICGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN 16L Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong port (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong ram (83th percentile)83th %ile
  • Strong storage (73th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile

CLX Horus TGMHORRTU5106BM Black 2025

  • Strong storage (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong port (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong ram (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: CLX Horus TGMHORRTU5106BM

Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 14 of 27 specs.

HP OMEN 16L Besser bei:

Compact

CLX Horus TGMHORRTU5106BM Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation