Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II

Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II

Sony
12 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EOS R EOS R6 Mark III

Canon EOS R EOS R6 Mark III

Canon
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Beginner
Sony
12
Canon
98
Sports Wildlife
Sony
12
Canon
95
Youtube
Sony
10
Canon
95
Vlogging
Sony
8
Canon
87
Streaming
Sony
11
Canon
84
Travel
Sony
11
Canon
81
Wedding Events
Sony
9
Canon
80
Video
Sony
11
Canon
80
Photography
Sony
9
Canon
77
Product Photography
Sony
10
Canon
76

Spezifikationen

Sony Alpha ZV-E10 IICanon EOS R EOS R6 Mark III
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Sizefull-frame
Megapixels32.5 MP
ISO Range100
ProcessorDIGIC X
Autofocus
AF PointsKeine Daten
1,053
AF TypePhoto, VideoPhase Detection: 1053
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)40 fps
Burst (Electronic)40 fps
Max Shutter1/16000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution6K
4K FPS120 fps
1080p FPS180 fps
10-bit
Log Profile
RAW Video
CodecH.264, H.265, ProRes RAW
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution3.7M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.13 kg0.61 kg
Battery Life620 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB-C
HDMIHDMI Output
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II

  • Below average build (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

Canon EOS R EOS R6 Mark III

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EOS R EOS R6 Mark III

Scores 100 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 25 of 33 specs.

Canon EOS R EOS R6 Mark III Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography