FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
33 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nextbase NBDVRS2RFCW Black

Nextbase NBDVRS2RFCW Black

Nextbase
20 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Beginner
FLATIC
37
Nextbase
18
Video
FLATIC
37
Nextbase
14
Product Photography
FLATIC
33
Nextbase
14
Youtube
FLATIC
31
Nextbase
13
Photography
FLATIC
31
Nextbase
15
Wedding Events
FLATIC
28
Nextbase
13
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
26
Nextbase
15
Streaming
FLATIC
25
Nextbase
9
Travel
FLATIC
24
Nextbase
12
Vlogging
FLATIC
23
Nextbase
7

Spezifikationen

FLATICNextbase NBDVRS2RFCW
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K1080p
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

FLATIC

  • Strong video (77th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average display (26th percentile)
  • Below average burst (29th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)

Nextbase NBDVRS2RFCW Black

  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)

Preise

FLATIC is 334 MX$ cheaper (1.2x less).

FLATIC0.021Score pro Dollar
vs
Nextbase NBDVRS2RFCW Black0.010Score pro Dollar

FLATIC bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Nextbase NBDVRS2RFCW Black

Fazit

Gewinner: FLATIC

Scores 33 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 6 specs.

FLATIC Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen