FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
PUSOKEI

PUSOKEI

PUSOKEI
31 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Video
FLATIC
39
PUSOKEI
41
Product Photography
FLATIC
37
PUSOKEI
40
Beginner
FLATIC
36
PUSOKEI
29
Photography
FLATIC
36
PUSOKEI
35
Wedding Events
FLATIC
33
PUSOKEI
33
Youtube
FLATIC
31
PUSOKEI
32
Streaming
FLATIC
26
PUSOKEI
29
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
26
PUSOKEI
24
Travel
FLATIC
23
PUSOKEI
21
Vlogging
FLATIC
23
PUSOKEI
22

Spezifikationen

FLATICPUSOKEI
Sensor
TypeCMOSCMOS
Size1/3-inchaps_h
Megapixels64 MP88 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K8K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg
Connectivity
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

FLATIC

  • Strong video (75th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average burst (27th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (30th percentile)

PUSOKEI

  • Strong video (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Strong sensor (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average social proof (22th percentile)
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average burst (27th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (30th percentile)

Preise

FLATIC is 649 MX$ cheaper (1.4x less).

FLATIC0.020Score pro Dollar
vs
PUSOKEI0.014Score pro Dollar

FLATIC bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched — FLATIC wins 2 specs while PUSOKEI wins 3.

FLATIC Besser bei:

TravelBeginnerSports Wildlife

PUSOKEI Besser bei:

StreamingProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen