Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

Kodak
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Yashica City City 300 Black

Yashica City City 300 Black

Yashica
38 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Kodak
49
Yashica
30
Streaming
Kodak
29
Yashica
47
Product Photography
Kodak
26
Yashica
47
Video
Kodak
27
Yashica
43
Beginner
Kodak
38
Yashica
39
Photography
Kodak
27
Yashica
38
Youtube
Kodak
24
Yashica
37
Wedding Events
Kodak
35
Yashica
34
Sports Wildlife
Kodak
30
Yashica
23
Vlogging
Kodak
23
Yashica
30

Spezifikationen

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2Yashica City City 300
Sensor
TypeBSI-CMOS
Size1/2.3-inch1/1.56"
Megapixels16 MP50 MP
ISO Range100
Autofocus
AF Points25
Eye AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)6 fps
Max Shutter1/2000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p4K
4K FPS30 fps
1080p FPS30 fps120 fps
10-bit
RAW Video
CodecH.264/MOVMP4
Display & EVF
Screen Size2.7"
Touchscreen
Articulating
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.18 kg0.19 kg
Battery Life2000 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB-2.0USB-C
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue

  • Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (72th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average af (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average display (25th percentile)

Yashica City City 300 Black

  • Strong connectivity (75th percentile)
  • Strong video (68th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (67th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (65th percentile)
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average display (25th percentile)
  • Below average burst (28th percentile)
  • Below average af (33th percentile)

Fazit

Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched — Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 wins 8 specs while Yashica City City 300 wins 7.

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Besser bei:

TravelSports Wildlife

Yashica City City 300 Besser bei:

VideoYoutubeVloggingStreamingPhotographyProduct Photography