NASA BM2

NASA BM2

NASA
11 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 2025

Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 2025

Canon
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Beginner
NASA
8
Canon
97
Wedding Events
NASA
11
Canon
96
Video
NASA
11
Canon
95
Sports Wildlife
NASA
13
Canon
94
Youtube
NASA
7
Canon
93
Photography
NASA
12
Canon
92
Product Photography
NASA
9
Canon
89
Travel
NASA
6
Canon
89
Vlogging
NASA
3
Canon
86
Streaming
NASA
4
Canon
83

Spezifikationen

NASA BM2Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Sizefull-frame
Megapixels32.5 MP
ISO Range100
ProcessorDIGIC X
Autofocus
AF PointsKeine Daten
1,053
AF TypePhoto, VideoPhase Detection: 1053
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)40 fps
Burst (Electronic)40 fps
Max Shutter1/16000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p6K
4K FPS120 fps
1080p FPS180 fps
10-bit
Log Profile
RAW Video
CodecH.264, H.265, ProRes RAW
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution3.7M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.61 kg
Battery Life620 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB-C
HDMIHDMI Output
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

NASA BM2

  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 2025

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III

Scores 100 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 26 of 33 specs.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography