OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro

OM System
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
NDI AIDA Imaging 4:2:2 (Ycbcr) 10bit

NDI AIDA Imaging 4:2:2 (Ycbcr) 10bit

NDI
23 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Beginner
OM System
24
NDI
23
Travel
OM System
19
NDI
14
Streaming
OM System
19
NDI
12
Product Photography
OM System
17
NDI
16
Sports Wildlife
OM System
15
NDI
17
Photography
OM System
15
NDI
17
Youtube
OM System
16
NDI
15
Video
OM System
15
NDI
16
Wedding Events
OM System
13
NDI
14
Vlogging
OM System
14
NDI
9

Spezifikationen

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 MacroNDI AIDA Imaging
Sensor
Size5.346mm x 3.003mm (16.9)
Build
Weight0.13 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro

  • Strong user sentiment (83th percentile)83th %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Below average build (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

NDI AIDA Imaging 4:2:2 (Ycbcr) 10bit

  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)

Preise

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro is 1.359 MX$ cheaper (1.2x less).

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
NDI AIDA Imaging 4:2:2 (Ycbcr) 10bit0.003Score pro Dollar

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro

NDI AIDA Imaging 4:2:2 (Ycbcr) 10bit

Fazit

Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched — OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro wins 1 specs while NDI AIDA Imaging wins 0.

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro Besser bei:

TravelVloggingStreaming

NDI AIDA Imaging Besser bei:

Sports Wildlife

Auch in Betracht ziehen