Lydith 30mm f/3.5 II Review
The Meyer-Optik Lydith 30mm f/3.5 costs $699 but has some of the worst optical performance we've tested. It's a niche item for artists, not a practical lens.
The 30-Second Version
This $699 manual focus lens has some of the worst optical performance we've tested. It's a boutique collectible for artists, not a tool for photographers.
Overview
The Meyer-Optik Gorlitz Lydith 30mm f/3.5 II is a lens that makes you ask 'why?' before you ask 'how much?' It's a manual focus prime lens with a slow f/3.5 aperture that costs $699. The one thing to know is this: it's a niche, boutique item for collectors and artists who want a specific, vintage-inspired look, not a practical tool for modern photography. If you're looking for sharpness, speed, or versatility, you're in the wrong aisle.
Performance
What surprised us, looking at the data, is how poorly it performs optically. It ranks dead last in our optical quality database. That means its sharpness, contrast, and color rendition are objectively worse than almost any other lens we've tested. For $699, you'd expect at least decent optics, but this lens delivers a soft, dreamy image that some might call 'character' and others would call 'a flaw.'
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Build quality is solid and feels premium. 88th
- The 10-blade aperture promises smooth bokeh circles. 79th
- It's a unique, manual-only experience that forces you to slow down.
- It's a full-frame lens with a compact 269g weight.
Cons
- Optical performance is one of the worst we've seen. 1th
- The f/3.5 max aperture is slow and limits low-light use. 5th
- It's a manual focus lens with no autofocus at all.
- The $699 price is absurd for its performance.
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 30 |
| Focal Length Max | 30 |
| Elements | 5 |
| Groups | 5 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10 |
Build
| Mount | Canon EF |
| Format | Full-Frame |
| Weight | 0.3 kg / 0.6 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 52 |
AF & Stabilization
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 160 |
Value & Pricing
It's not worth it. At $699, you're paying for a brand name and a vintage aesthetic, not for photographic capability. You could buy a modern, sharp, autofocus 35mm lens for half this price that would outperform it in every measurable way.
vs Competition
Compared to the Viltrox 35mm f1.7 for Nikon Z, which costs around $150, the Viltrox is sharper, has a vastly wider aperture for low light and creative control, and offers autofocus. Even the Meike 50mm f1.8 STM, another budget full-frame lens, trounces it in optical performance and features. If you want a 30mm-ish prime on a Canon EF mount, look at the Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM. It's sharper, has image stabilization, autofocus, and a better aperture, and it often costs less. The Lydith loses on every practical metric.
| Spec | Lydith 30mm f/3.5 II | Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF | Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X | Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony | Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus | Sirui Sniper Sirui Sniper 56mm f/1.2 Autofocus Lens (Sony E, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 30mm | 55mm | 35mm | 17-70mm | - | 56mm |
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/1.4 | f/1.7 | f/2.8 | f/1.4 | f/1.2 |
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X | Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | false | false | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 269 | 281 | 400 | 544 | 320 | 422 |
| AF Type | - | STM | STM | Autofocus | STM | Autofocus |
| Lens Type | - | - | - | Wide-Angle Zoom | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lydith 30mm f/3.5 II | 46.4 | 57 | 88 | 79.4 | 1.1 | 41.1 | 37.5 | 4.8 | 37.9 |
| Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare | 95.6 | 81.8 | 81.2 | 89.1 | 67.5 | 88.1 | 37.5 | 89.9 | 87.8 |
| Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare | 95.6 | 73.6 | 63.5 | 93.2 | 74 | 80.6 | 37.5 | 95.1 | 87.8 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare | 46.4 | 59.2 | 64.4 | 77.4 | 90.8 | 54.6 | 92.5 | 95.1 | 87.8 |
| Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare | 95.6 | 81.8 | 88.9 | 85.2 | 34.6 | 88.1 | 37.5 | 86.7 | 87.8 |
| Sirui Sniper 56mm f/1.2 Autofocus Compare | 46.4 | 96.7 | 74 | 53.4 | 79.8 | 95.9 | 37.5 | 98 | 87.8 |
Common Questions
Q: Is the soft image quality a defect or a feature?
It's a deliberate feature of the design. They're selling a 'vintage character,' not modern sharpness. If you want crisp photos, this isn't your lens.
Q: Why is it so expensive?
The price is mostly for the brand name, the niche manual focus experience, and the build materials. It's not justified by its optical performance at all.
Q: Can I use this for landscape photography?
No. It scored abysmally low for landscape in our tests. The soft optics and slow aperture make it a terrible choice for capturing detail in scenes.
Who Should Skip This
If you're looking for a sharp, reliable, everyday 30mm prime lens, this isn't it. Go get a Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM or a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 instead. If you need a lens for macro or portrait work, look elsewhere. This lens is only for the collector who values 'vintage vibe' over actual results.
Verdict
We can't recommend buying this lens for actual photography. It's a luxury item, a piece of camera jewelry for someone who already has a collection of sharp, modern lenses and wants something with 'character' for artistic experiments. For anyone else, especially a beginner or someone looking for a reliable prime lens, this is a hard pass. Save your money and buy a lens that actually helps you take better pictures.