Sennheiser HD 400 HD 400 Pro
Sennheiser
41 Общая оценка
vs
JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 Общая оценка
Оценки
Budget
Commute
Music
Work
Gaming
Calls
Studio
Характеристики
| Sennheiser HD 400 HD 400 Pro | JBL Tune 770NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.24 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Velour | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | Dynamic Driver |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Freq Min | 6 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 38 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 120 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Codecs | — | JBL Tune 770NC - Adaptive Noise Cancelling with Smart Ambient Wireless Over-Ear Headphones, Bluetooth 5.3, Up to 70H Battery Life with Speed Charge, Lightweight, Comfortable & Foldable Design (Black) |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Плюсы и минусы
Sennheiser HD 400 HD 400 Pro
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Strong comfort (65th percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
Цены
Sennheiser HD 400 HD 400 Pro
JBL Tune 770NC
No current pricing available
Вердикт
Победитель: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 32 specs.
