Samsung

Samsung

Samsung
12 종합 점수
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

Acer
77 종합 점수

점수

Gaming
Samsung
3
Acer
88
Creator
Samsung
4
Acer
86
Entertainment
Samsung
11
Acer
85
Developer
Samsung
10
Acer
74
Student
Samsung
15
Acer
66
Business
Samsung
15
Acer
65
Compact
Samsung
12
Acer
54

사양

SamsungAcer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N
Processor
CPUIntel Core Ultra 7 165H
CPU Multi-Core Score데이터 없음
25,914
Cores16
Frequency2.3 GHz
L3 Cache24 MB
Graphics
GPUNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU Benchmark Score데이터 없음
26,912
Typediscrete
VRAM8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB
RAM GenerationLPDDR5X
Storage 11 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD
Display
Size16"
Resolution3200 px
PanelIPS
Refresh Rate60 Hz165 Hz
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports3
ThunderboltThunderbolt 4
HDMI2 x HDMIHDMI 2.1
Wi-FiWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
Physical
Weight2.05 kg
OSWindows 11 Home

장단점

Samsung

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong reliability (78th percentile)
  • Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
  • Below average port (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average ram (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

  • Strong screen (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong port (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong gpu (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average compact (17th percentile)17th %ile

가격

Samsung is JP¥349,429 cheaper (7.7x less).

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

결론

승자: Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N

Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 26 specs.

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N 더 나은 점:

GamingCompactCreatorStudentBusinessDeveloperEntertainment

이것도 고려해보세요