Philips SHP9500
Philips
51 Punteggio complessivo
vs
JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Commute
Music
Work
Gaming
Calls
Studio
Specifiche
| Philips SHP9500 | JBL Tune 770NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | breathable ear cushion | — |
| Headband | steel | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | neodymium | Dynamic Driver |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Freq Min | 12 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 35 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Codecs | — | Adjustable Headband, Built-In Voice Assistant, Foldable, Multipoint Pairing, Noise Cancellation |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.5 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Pro e Contro
Philips SHP9500
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (31th percentile)
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
Prezzi
Philips SHP9500
JBL Tune 770NC
No current pricing available
Verdetto
Vincitore: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 33 specs.
