Fujifilm X X half Charcoal Silver Review
The Fujifilm X-Half is all style, not enough substance. You're paying for a beautiful body wrapped around tech that's several years behind the curve.
Overview
The Fujifilm X-Half is a camera that feels like a premium toy. It's built like a little tank and has Bluetooth connectivity that actually works, but you're paying a lot for that feel. The one thing to know is this: it's a stylish, well-built camera with a sensor and features that are several years behind the competition.
Performance
The performance is exactly what the specs suggest. That 17.7MP sensor lands in the 34th percentile, so image quality is fine for casual snaps but nothing special. The autofocus and video scores are in the 40s, which means it's slow to lock on and your video will look dated. Honestly, nothing here surprised me in a good way. It performs like an older camera.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong build (98th percentile) 86th
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile) 83th
Cons
- Below average sensor (34th percentile) 4th
Specifications
Full Specifications
Sensor
| Type | 13.3 x 8.8 mm (1"-Type) CMOS |
| Size | 1 inch" |
| Megapixels | 17.74 |
| ISO Range | 200 |
Autofocus
| AF Type | Single AF Continuous AF MF |
Shooting
| Max Shutter | 1/2000 |
Video
| Max Resolution | 1080p |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 2.4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | No |
| EVF Resolution | 920000 |
Build
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| USB | USB-C |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
Value & Pricing
At $849, the value proposition is rough. You're spending premium money for mid-tier, aging tech wrapped in a beautiful shell. It's not worth it if you care about image quality or features per dollar.
vs Competition
Look at the Sony ZV-E10 II instead. For similar money, you get a modern sensor, vastly better autofocus and video features, and a flip-out screen perfect for content. If you're stuck on the Fujifilm look, the X-E5 is a more modern option in their lineup. The Nikon Z30 is another strong contender that runs circles around the X-Half in autofocus and video for less cash. This camera is competing with models from 3-4 years ago.
| Spec | Fujifilm X X half | Canon EOS R Canon EOS R6 Mark II Mirrorless Camera | Nikon Z Nikon Z6 III Mirrorless Camera | Sony Alpha Sony a7 IV Mirrorless Camera | Panasonic Lumix GH Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Mirrorless Camera with 12-35mm | OM System OM OM SYSTEM OM-5 Mark II Mirrorless Camera with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact | Mirrorless | Mirrorless | Mirrorless | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor | 17.7MP 1 inch | 24.2MP Full Frame | 24.5MP Full Frame | 33MP Full Frame | 25.2MP Four Thirds | 21.8MP Four Thirds |
| AF Points | - | 1053 | 299 | 759 | 315 | 121 |
| Burst FPS | - | 40 | 20 | 10 | 75 | 30 |
| Video | 1080p | 4K @60fps | 6K @120fps | 4K @60fps | 5K | 4K @24fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 240 | 590 | 669 | 635 | 726 | 371 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Evf | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fujifilm X X half | 42.5 | 86.2 | 3.9 | 36.3 | 28.7 | 53.8 | 48.1 | 75.8 | 82.8 | 34.8 | 40.9 |
| Canon EOS R 6 Mark II Compare | 99.1 | 96.2 | 96.8 | 95.9 | 89.9 | 94.9 | 99.4 | 95.6 | 96.1 | 98 | 90 |
| Nikon Z 6 III Compare | 94.7 | 99 | 98.3 | 87 | 99.2 | 96 | 96.6 | 95.6 | 96.1 | 98 | 90 |
| Sony Alpha a7 IV Compare | 98.1 | 96.5 | 97.6 | 76.7 | 89.9 | 97.5 | 98.1 | 95.6 | 96.1 | 98 | 90 |
| Panasonic Lumix GH 7 Compare | 94.2 | 96.2 | 81.9 | 98 | 94.8 | 73.1 | 96.4 | 87 | 96.1 | 98 | 99.4 |
| OM System OM 5 Mark II Compare | 92.1 | 94.3 | 93.3 | 92.1 | 59.2 | 70.9 | 95.6 | 95.6 | 90.4 | 92.4 | 98.6 |
Verdict
I can't recommend the Fujifilm X-Half. It's a charming camera let down by its core components. Unless you absolutely must have this specific retro look and feel and don't care about performance, there are at least three better options at this price. Save your money and buy something newer.