Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
Audio-Technica
53 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meze LIRIC Liric2
Meze
36 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Studio
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Work
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Audio-Technica ATH-WP900 | Meze LIRIC Liric2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.24 kg★ | 0.43 kg |
| Ear Cushion | synthetic leather | Leather |
| Headband | synthetic leather | Adjustable Headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | planar magnetic |
| Driver Size | 53 mm | 92 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 50 kHz | 92 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 61 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✗ |
| Transparency | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multipoint | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.2000000476837158 m | 1.2999999523162842 m |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✗ |
| NC Mic | — | ✗ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Vor- & Nachteile
Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong comfort (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average anc (31th percentile)
- Below average social proof (33th percentile)
Meze LIRIC Liric2
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Below average comfort (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average social proof (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average anc (31th percentile)
Preise
Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
Meze LIRIC Liric2
Fazit
Gewinner: Audio-Technica ATH-WP900
Scores 53 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 3 of 28 specs.
