Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981

Beyerdynamic
77 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fostex TH616

Fostex TH616

Fostex
32 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Music
Beyerdynamic
81
Fostex
53
Gaming
Beyerdynamic
79
Fostex
26
Studio
Beyerdynamic
75
Fostex
53
Work
Beyerdynamic
72
Fostex
16
Commute
Beyerdynamic
71
Fostex
21
Budget
Beyerdynamic
69
Fostex
33
Calls
Beyerdynamic
65
Fostex
12

Spezifikationen

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981Fostex TH616
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedopen
Foldable
Weight0.32 kg0.37 kg
Ear Cushionmemory foamvegan leather
Headbandmemory foam
Audio
Driver TypeDynamicdynamic
Driver Size45 mm50 mm
Freq Min5 Hz5 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz45 kHz
Impedance25 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length3 m
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life50 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Appbeyerdynamic App

Vor- & Nachteile

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong battery (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile

Fostex TH616

  • Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average comfort (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)

Preise

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981 is 89.177 ¥ cheaper (3.0x less).

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981

Fazit

Gewinner: Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981

Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 33 specs.

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 1000981 Besser bei:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Auch in Betracht ziehen