Audeze LCD-XC
Audeze
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2
Fostex
40 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Studio
Music
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Audeze LCD-XC | Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Weight | 1.81 kg | 0.39 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | carbon weave | protein leather |
| Headband | suspension headband | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | planar magnetic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 106 mm★ | 50 mm |
| Freq Min | 10 Hz | 5 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 50 kHz★ | 45 kHz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 25 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 100 dB |
| Codecs | Audeze LCD-XC Over Ear Closed Back Headphone, Carbon Weave earcups with Suspension Headband, Creator Edition with Economy Carry case – New 2021 Version | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wired Connector | 6.35mm | 6.35mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.899999976158142 m | 3 m |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Audeze LCD-XC
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average comfort (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2
- Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (70th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average social proof (33th percentile)
Preise
Audeze LCD-XC
Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2
Fazit
Gleichstand
Both products are closely matched — Audeze LCD-XC wins 3 specs while Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2 wins 2.
