Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
Dell
91 Pontuação geral
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2024
ASUS
93 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Office
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Creative
Portable
Especificações
| Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 34.1" | 32" |
| Resolution | 3440x1440 | 4K |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,900 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible | G-Sync Compatible |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 98% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-Bit+FRC | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 400 True Black |
| HDR Support | — | Dolby Vision |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | 32W★ | 42W |
| Weight | 10.81 kg | 8.80 kg★ |
Prós e Contras
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2024
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
Preços
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 20230.092pontos por dólar
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 20240.061pontos por dólar
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023 oferece 1.5x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32"
Scores 93 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 30 specs.
