KIPON RF Colibri 35mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine Review

The KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 is a well-built manual cine prime with a distinct look, but its mediocre aperture and optical scores make it a tough sell outside of a dedicated film set.

Focal Length 35mm
Mount Canon RF
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 405 g
KIPON RF Colibri 35mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine lens
40.2 종합 점수

The 30-Second Version

A $1150 manual cine prime for Canon RF. Its T2.5 aperture and optical scores are mediocre, but it's built like a tank (77th percentile) for rig use. Only consider if you want the Colibri series' consistent 80mm front diameter and cine gears for a matched set.

Overview

The KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 is a niche lens that knows its audience. It's a compact, manual focus cine lens designed for Canon RF shooters who want a consistent look across a set. At $1150, it's priced like a specialty tool, not a general-purpose prime. Its overall score of 37.5 out of 100 in our database tells you it's not trying to be everything, but its 77th percentile build quality suggests it's built for the rigors of a cage and follow focus.

Performance

Performance here is about the features, not the specs. The T2.5 aperture lands in the 29th percentile, so it's not a low-light monster. Optical quality sits at the 35th percentile, meaning it's sharp enough for video but don't expect photography-grade perfection. Where it shines is in its cine-specific design: the 300-degree focus rotation and 0.8 MOD gears give you precise manual control, and the 10-blade iris creates that unique star-shaped bokeh. It's a lens built for pulling focus, not for chasing it.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.4
Bokeh 48.4
Build 76.2
Macro 62.9
Optical 34.6
Aperture 29.7
Versatility 37.5
Stabilization 37.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Build quality is in the 77th percentile, feeling solid and ready for a rig. 76th
  • Common 80mm front diameter and gear positions make it easy to swap with other Colibri lenses on set.
  • The 10-blade diaphragm and specific optical design create a distinct, cinematic star-shaped bokeh.
  • 300-degree focus rotation offers exceptional manual control for precise focus pulls.
  • Compact and lightweight at 405g, which is a plus for gimbal or handheld setups.

Cons

  • A T2.5 max aperture is in the 29th percentile, limiting low-light performance. 30th
  • No autofocus, which is fine for cine, but the AF score of 45th percentile shows it's a manual-only tool. 35th
  • Optical performance is only in the 35th percentile, so absolute sharpness isn't its primary goal.
  • No image stabilization (36th percentile), so you'll need to handle camera shake externally.
  • A 330mm minimum focus distance isn't great for close-up work, reflected in its 55th percentile macro score.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 35
Focal Length Max 35

Aperture

Diaphragm Blades 10

Build

Mount Canon RF
Format Full-Frame
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 330

Value & Pricing

At $1150, the value proposition is very specific. You're paying for the cine-ready build, the consistent design language with other Colibri lenses, and that unique bokeh character. It's not a value leader in terms of pure optical specs—you can get faster, sharper autofocus lenses for less. The value is in the workflow. If you're building out a matched set of manual cine primes for your RF camera, the price makes sense. If you're a solo shooter who needs autofocus, it's a tough sell.

US$1,150

vs Competition

Compared to the Viltrox 35mm F1.7, you're giving up over two stops of light (F1.7 vs T2.5) and autofocus for the Colibri's manual cine features. The Viltrox is a stills/video hybrid; the Colibri is a dedicated video tool. Against the Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S, the Nikon destroys it in optical performance and autofocus but lacks the geared focus ring and common front diameter for a lens set. The Meike 55mm F1.8 Pro is another hybrid, offering AF and a brighter aperture but in a different focal length. The Colibri only wins if your priority is a manual cine lens ecosystem.

Spec KIPON RF Colibri 35mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Nikon NIKKOR Z Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Lens (Nikon Z)
Focal Length 35mm 55mm 35mm 17-70mm 24mm 24-70mm
Max Aperture - f/1.4 f/1.7 f/2.8 f/1.8 f/2.8
Mount Canon RF Nikon Z Fujifilm X Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M Canon RF Nikon Z
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false true
Weight (g) 405 281 400 544 272 676
AF Type - STM STM Autofocus Autofocus Autofocus
Lens Type - - - Wide-Angle Zoom Wide-Angle Wide-Angle Zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilityStabilization
KIPON RF Colibri 35mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 46.448.476.262.934.629.737.537.9
Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare 95.681.881.289.167.588.137.587.8
Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare 95.673.663.593.27480.637.587.8
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare 46.459.264.477.490.854.692.587.8
Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare 46.481.887.88182.575.837.599.9
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Compare 46.471.672.372.49754.685.487.8

Common Questions

Q: How does the T2.5 aperture compare to an F1.8 lens for low light?

T2.5 is about 1.3 stops slower than F1.8, which means it lets in less than half the light. Its aperture score is in the 29th percentile, so it's not a low-light champion. You'll need more light or a higher ISO compared to most modern fast primes.

Q: Is the star-shaped bokeh really that noticeable?

Yes, it's a defining characteristic. The 10-blade diaphragm is designed to create that look, which scores in the 48th percentile for bokeh quality in our tests. It's a specific, cinematic effect that you'll either love or find too stylized for general use.

Q: Can I use this lens for photography?

You can, but we wouldn't recommend it. With no autofocus (45th percentile AF score) and optical performance in the 35th percentile, it's outperformed by dedicated photo lenses. It's built for manual focus video work, where its long focus throw and geared ring are assets, not liabilities.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you need autofocus, shoot in low light without controlled lighting, or prioritize optical sharpness above all else. Its scores in aperture (29th percentile), optical performance (35th), and AF (45th) are all weak compared to hybrid photo/video lenses. It's also a poor choice for landscape work, which is its weakest category at 30.2 out of 100. If you're not committed to a manual cine lens ecosystem, your money is better spent elsewhere.

Verdict

We can only recommend the KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 if you're deep into manual filmmaking with a Canon RF camera and plan to buy into the Colibri series for its consistent handling. Its middling optical and aperture scores mean it's a compromise as a standalone lens. But for that specific user—someone who values the 300-degree focus throw, the 0.8 MOD gears, and the ability to swap lenses without changing matte boxes or follow focus setups—it's a competent, well-built option. For everyone else, a faster, autofocus hybrid lens will be more versatile and likely cheaper.